Best MVA lead companies (2026)
Six providers of motor vehicle accident leads, compared on what each one actually publishes — pricing, exclusivity, screening, compliance, and evidence — rather than on marketing claims.
By Tarun Kapoor, Founder, MVA Leads · Reviewed 2026-07-13
Disclosure and methodology — read this first
MVA Leads publishes this guide and appears in it. To keep it useful anyway, we apply one rule: every claim about every provider (including us) comes from that provider’s own public website, reviewed on 2026-07-13. Where a provider doesn’t publish something, we write “not published” instead of guessing. We don’t rank providers on a score — we show what each one discloses and let you weigh it. Verify current terms directly before buying; offers change.
The comparison
| Provider | Model | Published pricing | MVA-only focus | Published methodology / data |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MVA Leads | Exclusive form leads, pay-per-lead | Yes — $250–$500 CPL, full state tables + JSON dataset | Yes | Yes — 2026 Cost Report |
| Kurios | Exclusive form leads, pay-per-lead | Partial — $315–$350 illustrative range; exact quote per state | Yes | Not published |
| Legal Brand Marketing | Exclusive leads, 13+ practice areas | No — quote on contact | No | Not published (cites NSC statistics) |
| OnPoint Legal Leads | Exclusive web leads, live transfers, signed docs | No — quote on contact | PI-focused (multiple case types) | Conversion claims, no methodology |
| BrokerCalls | Pay-per-call network, ~10 verticals | No — quote on contact | No | Not published |
| Legenex | Raw/qualified leads, transfers, revenue-share | No | No | Not published |
Provider profiles
Kurios
Kurios (kuriosbrand.com) is an exclusive MVA lead provider that generates leads through its own ad campaigns and sells them pay-per-lead with a three-month, 50-leads-per-month test batch as its entry offer.
Best for: Firms that want broad multi-state coverage from a newer provider and are comfortable with a ~$16K/month test commitment. Full MVA Leads vs. Kurios comparison →
Legal Brand Marketing
Legal Brand Marketing (LBM) is a Calabasas, California lead generation company selling exclusive pay-per-lead inquiries across 13+ practice areas, including motor vehicle accident leads, with delivery by email, live transfer, SMS, or CRM.
Best for: Firms buying leads across several practice areas from one vendor and comfortable requesting quotes rather than seeing published pricing. Full MVA Leads vs. Legal Brand Marketing comparison →
OnPoint Legal Leads
OnPoint Legal Leads is a Dallas, Texas lead provider (operating since 2016) selling exclusive, pre-qualified personal injury leads — including live-transfer auto accident calls and signed-document cases — with TCPA and HIPAA compliance processes and TrustedForm consent certification.
Best for: Firms that specifically want live-transfer calls or signed-document cases and are comfortable with quote-on-contact pricing. Full MVA Leads vs. OnPoint Legal Leads comparison →
BrokerCalls
BrokerCalls is a pay-per-call lead network that sells inbound qualified phone calls across roughly ten verticals — insurance, home services, behavioral health, mass tort, and MVA/legal among them — on a per-qualified-call fee with no long-term commitment.
Best for: Firms with strong live phone intake that prefer paying per inbound call across a broker network. Full MVA Leads vs. BrokerCalls comparison →
Legenex
Legenex is a generalist lead generation company offering raw leads, qualified tiered leads, inbound calls and live transfers, and revenue-share arrangements, with a service page dedicated to motor vehicle accident leads.
Best for: Firms exploring revenue-share lead arrangements rather than fixed pay-per-lead pricing. Full MVA Leads vs. Legenex comparison →
MVA Leads (that’s us)
MVA Leads sells exclusive motor vehicle accident leads only — generated in-house, delivered in real time with documented TCPA consent, priced from $3,000/month on month-to-month terms. We are the only provider in this list that publishes complete state-by-state pricing and a methodology-disclosed cost report with a machine-readable dataset. Best for: solo attorneys and small-to-mid PI firms that want to verify the economics before the first sales call.
How to choose (five checks)
- Is pricing published? If not, benchmark the quote against $250–$500 exclusive CPL before committing.
- Is exclusivity contractual?Ask how the provider defines “exclusive” and whether leads are ever re-marketed later.
- What are the exact screening criteria? Injury, fault, representation status, and recency at minimum.
- Is TCPA consent documented per lead? Timestamp and IP capture protect the firm, not just the vendor.
- Do performance claims have a methodology? A conversion percentage without a stated sample and period is a marketing line, not a benchmark.